2006 LAnglore (Eric Pfifferling) Comeyre Ctes du Rhone

originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
[
Another reason for supporting a tradition based, imperfect definition.
So, here's my problem with this way of saying it: We no longer have the kind of weather that our traditional wine-makers did. It's changed. We probably should, too, a little. What Would Gentaz Do?

(Now go back and replace the word "weather" with "market". Then with "insect life". Et cetera.)

I only know CdP in enough detail to answer and not enough detail to answer well. The problems of current climate are recent enough to be in the memory of any winemaker over about the age of 40 (35, if like some, they started when they were 15 or 16). They've watched it happen and have been trying to deal with it. I expect they are using blending and vineyard techniques to do the best they can with the conditions, but my winemaking knowledge is insufficient to get to that. I do know that they consider years like 07 not by any means bad years but years that present their own kinds of challenges (Bravay and Charvin, who are quite happy with their 08s wouldn't argue with the description of that year as more difficult to deal with). But their benchmark is something like, still, what they think their terroir should give them as based on something like an historical experience.

If I knew enough about winemaking, I expect that I could detail both cellar and vineyard practices whose intention was clearly to handle-so to speak-what the years were giving them so that it could give what the winemaker thought his vineyards should give. From even a pretty relaxed metaphysics, I expect that it would be hard to distinguish between these practices (remember I say this from a near total position of ignorance)and Cambie's, which have been described to me as sometimes no more than choosing the ripest stuff he can to put in wines for which he consults in terms of naturalness and non-naturalness. Thus Parker can insist that Ferrando makes absolutely natural, non-interventionist wines. But anybody can taste the candied quality of those wines.
 
I think the Mosel faces the same issues. Some of it is clonal selection, and I believe an increasing part of it is just moving to a higher oeschle style. They are fortunate to have somewhat more latitude due to their more northerly position, and their greater range of styles. But I sometimes mourn for the dea(r)th of sub-90 oeschle Auslesen.
 
This was one of the topics of much discussion when I was in Alsace earlier this year. Unlike the Mosel, it couldn't be called cool-climate viticulture over big stretches of the vineyards long-considered the better ones, and yet they're still working with cooler-climate grapes. The "heat event of [their] lifetimes" in 1997 became Take 2 in 2000, Take 3 in 2003, and 2005 wasn't exactly temperate either. Given that they're already struggling with sugar, acid, and balance, this isn't welcome news.

It'll help some of the formerly difficult vineyards, especially in the Bas-Rhin where things can be more sheltered and might now be more consistent, but I do wonder what owning on the Brand, or Mambourg, or Furstentum, or Hengst is going to mean in a few years. One of the reasons vineyards are famous is consistent ripening, and consistent ripening usually means ideal exposure. That's going to be the last thing anyone wants, soon.

We had the same conversation in the Langhe (with the exception of the loquacious producer who was enthusiastic about the consistency warming was bringing), but I've already talked about that elsewhere.
 
Back
Top