originally posted by scottreiner:
11 madwhat are your initial thoughts on the changes. i fear it may be ego run amok, it was for me pretty close to perfect before.
I'm all in favor. EMP's one continuing problem was that it simply was too big for a restaurant of its ambitions. I'll have to get on line for a resi in October ....Loading…
www.nytimes.com
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
I've been to 11 Mad many times.
Note the past tense!
Is 11 Mad on a par with Per Se?originally posted by scottreiner:
per se is booked well in advance; i'm sure there are plenty people to fill the emp seats. my complaint was mostly personal, i fear i've lost my local.
originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"
originally posted by kirk wallace:
I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Is 11 Mad on a par with Per Se?originally posted by scottreiner:
per se is booked well in advance; i'm sure there are plenty people to fill the emp seats. my complaint was mostly personal, i fear i've lost my local.
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"
I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.
I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
originally posted by lars makie:
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"
I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.
I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
For a destination restaurant, this makes some sense. I am reminded of a recent excursion to Alinea, during which I had exactly that mindset.
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by lars makie:
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"
I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.
I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
No stop by 11 East 53rd?
What's up with that?
originally posted by scottreiner:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.
i went to the website, whereas they used to list the by the glass program, it is no longer there. There is a far larger half bottle section and everything else mentioned in the piece has been updated on the site.
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Well. This is really ambiguous news.
On the one hand, I know someone who actually talks like this: "We realize that people come here for more than to be fed or have a business meeting, Mr. Humm said. When they walk into the door they basically say, Take me for a ride. "
For a destination restaurant, this makes some sense. I am reminded of a recent excursion to Alinea, during which I had exactly that mindset.
But that is "special occasion" dining. That visit to Alinea may be the only one I ever make. But I've been to 11 Mad many times.
Note the past tense! How can one proceed there for a normal meal with this sort of nonsense being spoken now:
"Until last week, it was possible to order one or two courses for lunch, but Mr. Guidara and Mr. Humm believed that was a disservice to the diners who make a gastronomic pilgrimage to the restaurant."
I'm sorry but lunch is not a pilgrimage.
Good luck to them. I hope, in these economic times, that there are still lots of gastro tourists to fill their tables.