11 mad

originally posted by scottreiner:
11 madwhat are your initial thoughts on the changes. i fear it may be ego run amok, it was for me pretty close to perfect before.

I'm all in favor. EMP's one continuing problem was that it simply was too big for a restaurant of its ambitions. I'll have to get on line for a resi in October ....
 
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"
 
Well. This is really ambiguous news.

On the one hand, I know someone who actually talks like this: "We realize that people come here for more than to be fed or have a business meeting, Mr. Humm said. When they walk into the door they basically say, Take me for a ride. "

For a destination restaurant, this makes some sense. I am reminded of a recent excursion to Alinea, during which I had exactly that mindset.

But that is "special occasion" dining. That visit to Alinea may be the only one I ever make. But I've been to 11 Mad many times.

Note the past tense! How can one proceed there for a normal meal with this sort of nonsense being spoken now:

"Until last week, it was possible to order one or two courses for lunch, but Mr. Guidara and Mr. Humm believed that was a disservice to the diners who make a gastronomic pilgrimage to the restaurant."

I'm sorry but lunch is not a pilgrimage.

Good luck to them. I hope, in these economic times, that there are still lots of gastro tourists to fill their tables.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
I've been to 11 Mad many times.

Note the past tense!

You should really have driven the nail into the coffin and said, "I went to 11 Mad many times."

Alas, I never made it there. It's interesting, as I was reading the new review, it made me think about Anthony Bourdain's latest book and how he skewers the whole tasting menu paradigm, saying chefs hate it and people should (or seem to), too. Something about not being able to have hot sex after ten courses, belching and farting the night away, etc. (Yes, this is AB.)

Though his view is that more and more restaurants are moving away from the tasting menu. If only! Set "menus" are much more frequent in France, and I don't like them, American anarchist that I am.
 
per se is booked well in advance; i'm sure there are plenty people to fill the emp seats. my complaint was mostly personal, i fear i've lost my local.
 
originally posted by scottreiner:
per se is booked well in advance; i'm sure there are plenty people to fill the emp seats. my complaint was mostly personal, i fear i've lost my local.
Is 11 Mad on a par with Per Se?
 
originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"

I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PQR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:


I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

i went to the website, whereas they used to list the by the glass program, it is no longer there. There is a far larger half bottle section and everything else mentioned in the piece has been updated on the site.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by scottreiner:
per se is booked well in advance; i'm sure there are plenty people to fill the emp seats. my complaint was mostly personal, i fear i've lost my local.
Is 11 Mad on a par with Per Se?

no. but, then again, ps is much more expensive. my point was simply that there are many people to fill the seats, and at the level at which emp is performing, the seats will be filled.
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?
originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"

I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.
 
originally posted by lars makie:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?
originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"

I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.

No stop by 11 East 53rd?

What's up with that?
 
Eleven Madison is/was superior to Per Se in my book, but you had to go all the way (i.e., not the 3 course menu) to experience it at that level. I definitely don't like the ring of the article that the retooling is meant to cater to food tourists. But that may be the article speaking and not the restaurant's intention. Shame about the loss of the back room - I always found those tables especially cozy. Anyway, I look forward to going back and seeing the new concept.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:

For a destination restaurant, this makes some sense. I am reminded of a recent excursion to Alinea, during which I had exactly that mindset.

Jeff,
Off the subject a bit, what were/are your thoughts on Alinea? Despite my proximity, I haven't yet made it there (and may pass on it in favor of Grant Achatz's Next venture). These changes to EMP won't affect me greatly since it remains high on my list of "destination dining" for NYC.

Mark Lipton
 
One other thought is that this whole story really gives me a whole new reason to hate the New York Times, as if I needed one. One damn four-star review works a complete turnover in a restaurant's clientele, which seems to have the secondary effect of inducing a complete turnover in the restaurant's concept to serve the new clientele.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by lars makie:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
no wines by the glass?
originally posted by scottreiner:
but, like i just typed off line to fass, "i suppose i'll live. but, no more bar menu. no more a la carte. no more wine by the glass. i may no longer be allowed in wearing jeans and flip flops!"

I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

I loved their lunch prix-fix for business meetings; best bargain in town PDR-wise, but I can see why it doesn't make sense for them, especially with fewer tables. I don't buy the bit about it affecting other diners who were their for a full gasto-pilgrimage; I've had many 4 hour lunches at Taillevent while other Ameircan tourists ate 2 course in 90 minutes and French business folks had 3 in 2+ hours and i don't think any of us were impeded in pleasure or purpose by the others.
It's funny. I just got into town last night and went in as I walked around. It was after 11pm, so they had stopped serving at the bar, but I asked to see the list because I had heard raves about the wines BTG. They still had some listed. In fact I really want to go back and get a glass of the '00 Puffeney Vin Jaune. They also had a couple sherries I was curious about. I had dinner there once a few years ago a few months before the Bruni review came out and thought it was really good; if I remember correctly we had the three course menu which was plenty (and a great value). I'm bummed that if I do go back, there'll be no bar menu or a la carte to pick from. It's too bad. I don't know why you'd consciously cut customers out.

No stop by 11 East 53rd?

What's up with that?

I'm in town for two weeks. I'll def be swinging by.
 
originally posted by scottreiner:
originally posted by kirk wallace:


I went back and re-read and even control+F'd; I see no mention of killing the wines by the glass program.

i went to the website, whereas they used to list the by the glass program, it is no longer there. There is a far larger half bottle section and everything else mentioned in the piece has been updated on the site.

I see 5 pages of wines by the glass here.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Well. This is really ambiguous news.

On the one hand, I know someone who actually talks like this: "We realize that people come here for more than to be fed or have a business meeting, Mr. Humm said. When they walk into the door they basically say, Take me for a ride. "

For a destination restaurant, this makes some sense. I am reminded of a recent excursion to Alinea, during which I had exactly that mindset.

But that is "special occasion" dining. That visit to Alinea may be the only one I ever make. But I've been to 11 Mad many times.

Note the past tense! How can one proceed there for a normal meal with this sort of nonsense being spoken now:

"Until last week, it was possible to order one or two courses for lunch, but Mr. Guidara and Mr. Humm believed that was a disservice to the diners who make a gastronomic pilgrimage to the restaurant."

I'm sorry but lunch is not a pilgrimage.

Good luck to them. I hope, in these economic times, that there are still lots of gastro tourists to fill their tables.

My thoughts run close to yours. I could happily go back to 11Mad seveal times a month.

No more.

But then they were already on that path in the last several years, especially as things like the corkage fee increased.

Happily Chicago still has several BYOB restaurants that come very close to the quality delivered by Humm in his first 2 years at 11 Mad.
 
Back
Top