originally posted by Yixin:
If Rudy could fake old wines (convincingly, from what I know)
yiz. and nyet. the fakes i have encountered have been as convincing as points. they simply work better for some more than others.
and, that, in so many ways, is how it goes, and why we should say, "so it goes": we aren't talking about the frog ganache with the killer spring, or cars that will lock you in for a spot of slow-roasting; or even a pill that will cure your acne at the price of your balls droping off.
nope, its whether or not hooch that your average dweeb can't tell from shit is actually teh shitz.
frankly, i'm not sure i give a fuck.
is that bad tie around your neck really the fault of your haberdasher? because the matter at hand seems to be not whether your hooch satisfactorily satisfies your expectations, but whether or not the fetid matter in your glass that you happily suck down at time t1 because you are told, "it is teh shitz!" (as you may or may not find it to be), turns out to be more shit that teh shitz when you wise up to your folly.
i'm 96 points on that!
or maybe 65. turns out most of the shit here is in the eye of the beholder. (ahem -- i know this turn of fatthought has its following, but the sink and i would like to take this moment to apologize to readers with a cellar full of 92 point $9.99 grenache and monastrell from coops in various unmentionable parts of spain: yes, deep in my chubby heart i feel your pain, but that shit wine you bought by the truck load with its "oodles of ripeness and outstanding bargain and drink now through 2042" that tastes like wood soup and cola is your own fault for believing that shelf talkers count as an inside track to a market inefficiency. uh, though actually, the fatsink says, "fuck you.")
is
this shit so different? how about the wealth of motherfuckers who have deluded themselves that pinot noir = anything but god awful shit when grown in the mediterranean climate of cali? do we start having to qualify the degree of denial in those who ought to know better but are sucked into their own well of stupidity into our opprobrium?
i mean shit, rudy sells "21 petrus" and the newbs who know no better lap it up until someone decides to play god; similarly, mother fuckers in the beqaa valleys of dear old cali proffer variations on prune juice and make vague allegories to another, very different beverage produced in the old world. in either case, i'm sure there is a level of connection (rudy's petrus contains 62 mouton cadet, jim's prune juice was made from vines that occasionally yield potable and interesting wine in better climes in burgundy).
which is to say, of course there is a difference to the situation where you drink the "21 petrus" from rudy and it turns out later your were duped vs the rich and tender experiences so many folks have had with various new world "wines" that turned out to be over hyped dog shit that turned its toes up prior to the opening of the projected "drinking window", but in the end, if you can't figure this shit out for yourself, who cares? is your tie ugly if you can't tell?
not sure, ask a friend. still not sure? yep, right: buy it, and it is your own fucking fault if it later turns out that you are wearing a dumb ass fucking tie. if, and when, you later decide that your tie looks like ass, you learn.
or, in other words, given what is at stake, and the levels of self delusion in all this shit, the heat in this topic leaves me cold.
fb. (for the sake of the million lurking newbs, i felt this needed saying.)